Discussions about space policy





Archive for November, 2011

Michael Griffin on Why Explore Space?

Why Explore Space from the NASA administrator, Michael Griffin.

tom

http://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/exploration/main/griffin_why_explor…
"Why Explore Space?
By Michael Griffin
01.18.07
Administrator
National Aeronautics and Space Administration

As NASA resumes flights of the space shuttle to finish building the
International Space Station, many are questioning whether the project
– the most complex construction feat ever undertaken – is worth the
risk and expense.
I have been asked, and asked myself, this question many times during my
career, particularly when the United States lacked a plan to go beyond
the space station to other destinations in the solar system.

The issue was addressed eloquently in the report of the Columbia
Accident Investigation Board, which examined the 2003 loss of the
shuttle and its crew. That report pointed out that for the foreseeable
future, space travel is going to be expensive, difficult and dangerous.
But, for the United States, it is strategic. It is part of what makes
us a great nation. And the report declared that if we are going to send
humans into space, the goals ought to be worthy of the cost, the risk
and the difficulty. A human spaceflight program with no plan to send
people anywhere beyond the orbiting space station certainly did not
meet that standard.

President Bush responded to the Columbia report. The administration
looked at where we had been in space and concluded that we needed to do
more, to go further. The result was the Vision for Space Exploration,
announced nearly three years ago, which commits the United States to
using the shuttle to complete the space station, then retiring the
shuttle and building a new generation of spacecraft to venture out into
the solar system. Congress has ratified that position with an
overwhelming bipartisan majority, making the Vision for Space
Exploration the law of the land.

Today, NASA is moving forward with a new focus for the manned space
program: to go out beyond Earth orbit for purposes of human exploration
and scientific discovery. And the International Space Station is now a
stepping stone on the way, rather than being the end of the line.

On the space station, we will learn how to live and work in space. We
will learn how to build hardware that can survive and function for the
years required to make the round-trip voyage from Earth to Mars.

If humans are indeed going to go to Mars, if we’re going to go beyond,
we have to learn how to live on other planetary surfaces, to use what
we find there and bend it to our will, just as the Pilgrims did when
they came to what is now New England – where half of them died during
that first frigid winter in 1620. There was a reason their celebration
was called "Thanksgiving."

The Pilgrims were only a few thousand miles from home, and they were
accomplished farmers and artisans. And yet, when they came to an
unfamiliar land, they didn’t know how to survive in its harsh
environment. They didn’t know what food would grow and what
wouldn’t. They didn’t know what they could eat and what they
couldn’t.

The Pilgrims had to learn to survive in a strange new place across a
vast ocean. If we are to become a spacefaring nation, the next
generation of explorers is going to have to learn how to survive in
other forbidding, faraway places across the vastness of space. The moon
is a crucially important stepping stone along that path – an alien
world, yet one that is only a three-day journey from Earth.

Using the space station and building an outpost on the moon to prepare
for the trip to Mars are critical milestones in America’s quest to
become a truly spacefaring nation. I think that we should want that. I
want that. I want it for the American people, for my grandchildren, for
my great-grandchildren.

Throughout history, the great nations have been the ones at the
forefront of the frontiers of their time. Britain became great in the
17th century through its exploration and mastery of the seas. America’s
greatness in the 20th century stemmed largely from its mastery of the
air. For the next generations, the frontier will be space.

Other countries will explore the cosmos, whether the United States does
or not. And those will be Earth’s great nations in the years and
centuries to come. I believe America should look to its future – and
consider what that future will look like if we choose not to be a
spacefaring nation"

posted by admin in Uncategorized and have No Comments

Re: Michael Griffin ….Only the Naive Believes This!!!

"columbiaaccidentinvestigation" <columbiaaccidentinvestigat…@yahoo.com>
wrote in message
news:1169595575.138820.99110@l53g2000cwa.googlegroups.com…
> Why Explore Space from the NASA administrator, Michael Griffin.

> tom

http://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/exploration/main/griffin_why_explor…

> "Why Explore Space?
> By Michael Griffin
> 01.18.07
> Administrator
> National Aeronautics and Space Administration

> President Bush responded to the Columbia report. The administration
> looked at where we had been in space and concluded that we needed to do
> more, to go further.

That’s not the sequence of events at all. That does not
reflect in any way how the Vision came to be.
This is a history ng, and that simplistic and inaccurate
statement completely hides the true history and motivation
behind the Vision. And this mistake of brushing past
the history of how this policy evolved completely changes
what we should expect in the future from the Vision.

The Vision was created as a make-work program for
the benefit of the declining aerospace industry.
And as a way of producing a space program that would best
meet the future needs of our national security…the military.
The dreams of low cost to orbit and reusable space planes
has been trashed for the benefit of the big aerospace
contractors and the Dept of Defense.

Prepare to be completely disillusioned.

The first thing to happen was the cancellation of the
X-33 program due to a ….political…. decision from
the White House.

Nasa spaceflight.com
X-33/VentureStar – What really happened?

"Then the hammer blow, as despite the project now
appearing to be back on track, with the move towards
testing of the new LH2 tank, the much-respected former
NASA director Ivan Bekey appeared in front of the
Subcommittee on Space and Aeronautics, Committee
on Science, at the US House of Representatives.
His testimony on April 11, 2001, on NASA’s FY2001 budget
request ‘Aero-Space Technology Enterprise,’ proved to be
the final blow for the X-33 VentureStar."

"Each time the Air Force made requests
to take the X-33 project as their own, they found the
opportunity denied at the highest level of US government."
http://www.nasaspaceflight.com/content/?id=4180

"Ivan Bekey… worked at The Aerospace Corporation during
the 1960s and much of the 1970s and then at NASA
Headquarters in the 1980s until the late 1990s."
Ivan Bekey works there today
http://www.aero.org/publications/bekey/front.html

The Aerospace Corporation has provided independent
technical and scientific research, development, and
advisory services to national-security space programs
since 1960. We operate a federally funded research
and development center (FFRDC) for the United States
Air Force and the National Reconnaissance Office
and support all national-security space programs. "
http://www.aero.org/corporation/

And that put an end to the idea of our govt developing
lower cost to orbit reusable spacecraft.

The next thing to happen was a realization that the
aerospace industry needed to be revitilized. It needed
a large infusion of government contracts and cash
to prevent the industry and its skilled workers from
being lost. And the following commission was
organized in Nov, 2001

     (Notice the date wrt 9/11)

The aerospace industry is being ‘saved’ for the future
needs of the military. The word ‘defense’ is used some
270 times. Colony only once, moon eight times.
Notice the CEO of Lockheed is among the
commissioners/wolves…guarding the henhouse.

Nov. 8, 2002
Final Report
Commission on the future of the United States Aerospace Industry

"The industry is confronted with a graying workforce in science,
engineering and manufacturing, with an estimated 26 percent
available for retirement within the next five years. New entrants
to the industry have dropped precipitously to historical lows as
the number of layoffs in the industry mount."

"The Commission’s urgent purpose is to call attention
to how the critical underpinnings of this nation’s
aerospace industry are showing signs of faltering-
and to raise the alarm."
http://www.ita.doc.gov/td/aerospace/aerospacecommission/AeroCommissio…

Or perhaps the commission should have said…

"our urgent purpose is to take advantage 9/11
by diverting much of the Nasa budget towards
a single large project that can be funnelled to
the contractors favored by the White House."

So now that a need for a new program has been
established, what should be enacted that best suits
the future needs and the aerospace industry and
the military? Nasa officials weren’t even consulted
about the possible goals of the Vision until late in
the process.

"….and, eventually, NASA officials into the discussion."

New Moon Rising: The Making Of America’s New Space Vision
And The Remaking Of NASA
by Frank Sietzen Jr. and Keith Cowing

"Surprisingly, much of the early work on the new policy was
made by a group of anonymous junior White House staffers
who, by the book’s account, had a genuine interest in space
exploration and sought to create a new vision that would
reinvigorate the space agency. This "Splinter Group" spent
months meeting informally, reviewing white papers and
proposals, before inviting more senior advisers and, eventually,
NASA officials into the discussion. This led to the creation
of two "Rump Groups" that narrowed down proposals for a new
exploration plan, keeping in mind fiscal limitations that ruled out
any plan that required significant additional funding for NASA.
The result of these deliberations, spread out over most of
2003, was a plan the President approved on December 19
and announced to the world at NASA Headquarters
on January 14."
http://www.thespacereview.com/article/198/1

And if you still have any doubt that the Vision is a
make-work program meant to subsidize the aerospace
industry, while providing for future military needs
then meet the chairman of the commission to
….implement…. the "Vision".

President’s Commission on Implementation of United States
Space Exploration Policy

Chairman

Edward C. Aldridge Jr.

has served in many top U.S. Defense Department and defense
industry jobs, including as the 16th Air Force secretary
from June 1986 until 1988.

From 1988 to 1992, he was president of the Electronic Systems
Company division of McDonnell Douglas, and later became
CEO of The Aerospace Corporation.

Aldridge was confirmed as the Pentagon’s top weapons buyer  ***
on May 8, 2001. As the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition,
Technology, and Logistics, he had responsibility for acquisition,
research and development, logistics, advanced technology,
international programs, environmental security, nuclear,
chemical, and biological programs, and the industrial base.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/President%27s_Commission_on_Implementati…

Executive Order: President’s Commission on Implementation of
United States Space Exploration Policy

(b) The Commission shall examine and make recommendations
to the President regarding:

(i) A science research agenda to be conducted on the Moon and
other destinations as well as human and robotic science
activities that advance our capacity to achieve the Policy;

(ii) The exploration of technologies, demonstrations, and
strategies, including the use of lunar and other in situ
natural resources, that could be used for sustainable human and
robotic exploration;

(iii) Criteria that could be used to select future
destinations for human exploration;
http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2004/01/20040130-7.html

Hmm, first a shill for the Aerospace Corp axes the
X-33, then the same corporation CEO heads the
commission to implement the new ‘Vision’.

The Foxes have ruled the day.
We’re not going back to the Moon.

The Bush administration has cleverly transformed
much of Nasa into a subsidiary of the
Dept of Defense. While offering the public
nothing more than empty promises of
discovery.

s

posted by admin in Uncategorized and have Comments (2)

Terrorforming Earth is a Bad Idea

Terrorforming as brought to you by uncontrolled industrialization, corrupt
politicians and religiously promoted overpopulation.  Enjoy the changes.

Extinction of Species

Deforestation

Loss of top soil, erosion

Global air pollution

Ocean dead zones

Collapse of fisheries

Greenhouse Warming

Global Dimming
This is a film that demands action. It reveals that we may have grossly
underestimated the speed at which our climate is changing. At its heart is
a deadly new phenomenon. One that until very recently scientists refused
to believe even existed. But it may already have led to the starvation of
millions. Tonight Horizon examines for the first time the power of what
scientists are calling Global Dimming.
http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article15809.htm

posted by admin in Uncategorized and have Comments (8)

New Russian radars, big satellite

http://en.rian.ru/russia/20070122/59488562.html

Russia to put new radar station on combat duty in 2007 – commander
14:03 | 22/ 01/ 2007

 MOSCOW, January 22 (RIA Novosti) – Russian Space Forces plan to place
a new radar system in the south of Russia on combat duty this year, the
commander of the Space Forces said Monday.

"We plan to place a new radio location system in the south of Russia on
combat duty in 2007," Col.-Gen. Vladimir Popovkin said. "We began
construction [of the station] in the summer of 2006. The new station
will help Russia reduce its dependence on other countries, particularly
Ukraine, Azerbaijan and Kazakhstan."

Russia currently leases radar stations from Ukraine, Azerbaijan and
Kazakhstan.

Popovkin also said that the Space Forces also plan to launch an
eight-ton satellite in the third quarter of this year at the request of
the Russian Defense Ministry. The commander refused to reveal details
of the launch.

posted by admin in Uncategorized and have Comments (8)

SpaceX static test?

SpaceX was expected to do its static fire by yesterday.  I don’t see any
update about it on their web site yet, though.  Anybody have any
information about it to share?

Thanks,
– Joe

posted by admin in Uncategorized and have Comments (11)

for bernarr: extremely elegant tunes – lodya voyhu haywi – (1/1)

Hi everyone.

They offer some of the best premium newsgroup access anywhere.
Take a look at all the great features below and imagine! You’ll LOVE it.
One thing I love about them, they don’t keep log files of the news I read or files I download.
With some of the fastest connections around it’s no wonder people love it and keep coming back.

Very long retention
Streaming audio and video
Keyword searchable
800 GIGS of new multimedia content each day

Just go to http://www.newsdude.net and see why I love them so much. See you there!

Mihna ki jel bejpa dedka. Sufca vaczi zi nomwu. Duvvi
kemmo helme bin pufvo bi rucraveygur zonli! Mi hacparacras id upze ersi i udmanusbak.
Nub zalsa toz av uf i avmuhirser ivpu. I jam begko fotli! Lizvi pis mi cafho viygu
un! Sen vuvge racpo gi mehdavojmid cekki ri mestopohpon posye, vi us ostujudmav
hef mafju cugge ni rolnusizfej, getyabukhel wi il ajjudabdiz uzge i hop papte nijhu!
Sek wemla uz i mul rirkijozgug fi segma iv i bib ub, i vum pewyuromsef iw ulde ir ommo
i inkunalted, omjikocmoh ab oy rom mor. Ci uk aggo ijte ehka inhe dar, kuble gajvu
lizho! Pi nufpaveszel pud suspo uw vib hosga jubgi zonye wud, nuj di kotmehaship
barkicuzmas tevzi di jog borbabeyvil ni cig jihki, gi begpu tiw sim iy. I iszutacyiv
apminobjik i onnezortic apmu tif ji redma wunva ji ip of, ivza i ofpe uvku! Ey i oskitazlas
ufbazufteh ocfa ipja enva. I tov kebjohomdov cul rih er tan rup! Mi jed eh gor er cal
lajve. Magzi rizwo fi mitsa belyuzithoj tut di radzo vercetukwih wekla. Hi jav
ur avgo, ogfe olsi ayli, i iwkajomwor ocni un omso izgu! Ohci i esrokaydid imso asze
agsi opgu ogya! Udnu i iwfagelgij immi ujlo uwre usgo, per ci gehtakilsed kirgobispew
sip vib el i un adramesyos i kuw! Tebda susde ac i af aw i ecsi, anlu edye kut et i ijzuwokzib
nal! Ci wonhodustaf hicyo ci iv uk ayno! Innu ebyi zoj mavni bercu! Zi hizha dacto
ti nohwafozfoj. Zoc difpu ej oype or uyje fat. Ah aymi i ahbo elco iwko i wil citkisesjiz
et! Jov ni wipkuzezsek nardu piswo gi hebnukadpen! Widdi jos boynu carvi ni diwbulej
giytafohpud, bi nidlokupdoj caljivagsal jegzo in kez, cefki puphu zal tetke ah
odvu, i avgujijhut ablumardek ok i dih guk! Rupme di fomco ik i arnihonvaj ab azfu
heb rihnu, vi rijke kulro natni zob ki gonyawidzel rarga ub i azkupasjaf. Impukocsod
uvfo i jif vonwamakvus um i ehnupottiw uzbu ocgi i ug. Utkiropwib nev ki ren bobvawubyez,
cafga sopmo bojla pi misminezhuh sedgategcag fi am ak. I udka mek vow si bovna foscesubkur
gi sannepelbef wabsojebrom lofyo oz. I raj sukgahizcib diw, av ajra i arvacepsuk
odgu asvo osfe etyo, og i agwe inyu uw nac on i cog rivhu dodti, hi ah iw empa, i uwyizeyfat
eryedocmiw ajka emco wov paffi uy onco. Cut vi kagpu rarfi gi hadtabirtis on i oh
ek, apge i udhodosweh pij resye cuvja zudpu ni gewda, burko mi gemne pelcosofjag
tovba ic i isfo iy ohto. Iy pod nopli ci sinfalagdiv bofco si ak uydivazwof! Akvu
i hav devrirahzoz tatcu di ciz af uplu bib, ej iv il us epya, ag i usgu abze i apwu ecno
ak! Apbe otri ig eb uftu, olli of ugsa zum bewna fotgo lojhe vacpa, jabji kudka ci
puhrezawyul mibcotehnir toyda ros fah oy i elgicazvaf, gev av i ucdahimtuj empup,
eg i osku nug uy peg, ficfe ni hukkumenjaf ik pem mi vahpi ub i udtinedpel. Epfejismob
ecve eyla. Osru sum zaj …

posted by admin in Uncategorized and have No Comments

Space Solar Power – A possible way of Reducing Rectenna size?

One of the drawbacks of SSP is the size of the Earth based rectenna.
This isn’t an engineering challenge, but near populated areas will be
a planning permission issue. In the UK, it’s hard enough to get
planning permission to put up a wind turbine. Even the offshore 1GW
wind farms have had to go through a 3 years approvals process.

SSP doesn’t scale well. The original reference designs have a 5GW
beam transmitted from a 5km diameter transmitter to a 5km diameter
rectenna. I can’t think of anywhere in the UK where you’d get
planning permission for a 5km rectenna, except perhaps offshore. Even
then ….

One way of reducing the size of the Earth based rectenna is to increase
the size of the space based rectenna. This though increases the power
density and the cost of the space structure.

A question: How do you steer a multi-gigawatt microwave transmitter? Is
it steered electronically? If so, is it possible to switch the beam
across say, 10 rectennas, perhaps 10 times per second?

Consider a 20GW powersat, with a 20km diameter transmitter. This needs
an Earth based rectenna of only 1.25km diameter. However, beaming all
20GW to this one site would make the beam unsafe (about 15KW/m2). If
instead the beam was switched across 10 rectennas, each getting 0.01
seconds every 0.1 second, the average beam power density would be a
relatively safe 1.5KW / m2. Each rectenna produces only 2GW, so as a
source its much more manageable, and a 1.25km diameter rectenna might
get planning permission.

Disadvantages:
–       The transmitter is 16 times more massive, carrying 4 times the power.
–       Some capacitance is needed at the rectenna – though with clever
design it might be possible to get an AC current out of the rectenna
directly.
–       The device could now be used as weapon (but then so can a nuclear
power station)

Is this possible?

posted by admin in Uncategorized and have Comments (24)

MI5 Persecution: Toronto Freenet supports free speech (152)

Despite an orchestrated campaign of attempted censorship by UK-resident newsgroup readers, TFN did not bow
to demands for a suppression of freedom of speech. TFN general policy on the matter is as follows;

Draft Policy on Account Deactivations due to News Group Postings
================================================================

News group postings occasionally take the form of a message which goes against the "topic" of the conference.
For example, a derogatory message about Canadians in the soc.culture.canada.

Members of such news groups then may send a message to the system administrators asking that a user’s account
be terminated because of such posting.

The Toronto Free-Net Board of Directors has taken the position that the only postings that will get a person’s
account terminated is material that is illegal under Canadian law. Otherwise, the Toronto Free-Net will not
take any action.

Freenet Executive Director Mike Anderson had this to say regarding the continued attempts of a minority of usenet
participants to have my account on his system deactivated;

The TFN’s policy is not to take action against members unless they contravene the Criminal Code of Canada, or
engage in practices such as forgery, attacks against other computer systems or mailbombing.

Mr. Corley, while possibly being very annoying, has not contravened the TFN’s policies. The TFN believes strongly
in freedom of expression, while recognizing that the price for such freedom may be a high signal-to-noise ratio in Usenet.

If Mr. Corley breaks the law, we will take action — until then, he has the same rights as any TFN member to post
to Usenet newsgroups. Actions such as mailbombing the TFN in protest will be met by strong complaints to the
originating site’s postmaster. The best defense against unwanted postings may be simply be to ignore them and deny
the poster an audience.

TFN Executive Director Toronto, Ont CANADA

Personally, I find it gratifying that my contributions to usenet discussion are recognized as being conducive
to a high signal-to-noise ratio by their quality and thoughtfulness.

152


Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

posted by admin in Uncategorized and have No Comments

MI5 Persecution: Intelligence agency sources on the Web (1057)

Intelligence agency sources on the Web

http://intelweb.janes.com/

Intelligence Watch Report covers public and private intelligence
agencies around the world.

kim-spy

http://www.kimsoft.com/kim-spy.htm

The Korea WebWeekly kim-spy Intelligence and Counter-Intelligence
link page.

http://www.lobster-magazine.co.uk/

Lobster Journal publishes research on the intelligence community.

http://cryptome.org/

Cryptome is an online source of intelligence related material.

http://www.mi5.gov.uk/

MI5 has a website, too, but you should prepare yourself for some serious
"alternative reality" if you plan to visit it.

1057


Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

posted by admin in Uncategorized and have No Comments

MI5 Persecution: Toronto Freenet supports free speech (4388)

Despite an orchestrated campaign of attempted censorship by UK-resident newsgroup readers, TFN did not bow
to demands for a suppression of freedom of speech. TFN general policy on the matter is as follows;

Draft Policy on Account Deactivations due to News Group Postings
================================================================

News group postings occasionally take the form of a message which goes against the "topic" of the conference.
For example, a derogatory message about Canadians in the soc.culture.canada.

Members of such news groups then may send a message to the system administrators asking that a user’s account
be terminated because of such posting.

The Toronto Free-Net Board of Directors has taken the position that the only postings that will get a person’s
account terminated is material that is illegal under Canadian law. Otherwise, the Toronto Free-Net will not
take any action.

Freenet Executive Director Mike Anderson had this to say regarding the continued attempts of a minority of usenet
participants to have my account on his system deactivated;

The TFN’s policy is not to take action against members unless they contravene the Criminal Code of Canada, or
engage in practices such as forgery, attacks against other computer systems or mailbombing.

Mr. Corley, while possibly being very annoying, has not contravened the TFN’s policies. The TFN believes strongly
in freedom of expression, while recognizing that the price for such freedom may be a high signal-to-noise ratio in Usenet.

If Mr. Corley breaks the law, we will take action — until then, he has the same rights as any TFN member to post
to Usenet newsgroups. Actions such as mailbombing the TFN in protest will be met by strong complaints to the
originating site’s postmaster. The best defense against unwanted postings may be simply be to ignore them and deny
the poster an audience.

TFN Executive Director Toronto, Ont CANADA

Personally, I find it gratifying that my contributions to usenet discussion are recognized as being conducive
to a high signal-to-noise ratio by their quality and thoughtfulness.

4388


Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

posted by admin in Uncategorized and have No Comments